Bagian 3 Tamat : Desain Indeks Glokal Multiporos untuk Negara Anggota PBB: Sebuah Kerangka Komprehensif untuk Mengukur Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Era Global-Lokal

Bagian 3 Tamat : Desain Indeks Glokal Multiporos untuk Negara Anggota PBB: Sebuah Kerangka Komprehensif untuk Mengukur Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Era Global-Lokal                                                                                                        Sambungan dari Bagian 2                                                                                                        humbly acknowledges this wisdom sambil berusaha untuk count what truly counts—dalam cara yang respectful terhadap diversity, grounded dalam science, dan oriented toward sustainable wellbeing untuk semua.

Refleksi Akhir: Mengukur untuk Mentransformasi

Measurement bukan sekadar technical exercise; ia adalah political act yang shapes priorities, alokasi resources, dan ultimately, kehidupan manusia. Seperti yang diingatkan oleh Stiglitz et al. (2009): "What we measure affects what we do."

Jika kita hanya mengukur GDP, kita akan mengoptimalkan untuk economic output tanpa memperhatikan distribusi, sustainability, atau wellbeing. Jika kita hanya mengukur HDI, kita mungkin mengabaikan environmental degradation atau cultural erosion. IGM, dengan kelima porosnya, mengajak kita untuk mengoptimalkan untuk flourishing yang lebih penuh dan seimbang.

Namun, caution diperlukan. Development measurement dapat menjadi tool untuk empowerment atau tool untuk surveillance dan control. IGM harus diimplementasikan dengan spirit humility, transparency, dan democratic participation. Data harus accessible, methodology harus open-source, dan communities harus memiliki voice dalam defining apa yang constitutes "development" untuk mereka.

Call to Action

Realisasi IGM memerlukan collective effort dari multiple stakeholders:

- UN dan international organizations: Provide institutional home dan financial support

- National governments: Commit resources untuk data collection dan participate dalam good faith

- Statisticians dan scientists: Continue refining methodology dan ensuring rigor

- Civil society:  Hold all actors accountable dan ensure marginalized voices are heard

- Private sector:  Align business practices dengan development priorities identified oleh IGM

- Citizens:  Engage critically dengan development metrics dan demand accountability

Journey toward comprehensive, glocal, multipolar development measurement telah dimulai. IGM adalah contribution modest namun sincere untuk journey ini. Success-nya akan diukur bukan hanya dalam citations atau adoptions, tetapi dalam sejauh mana ia membantu create world yang lebih just, sustainable, dan flourishing untuk semua.

Referensi

Abdallah, S., Thompson, S., Michaelson, J., Marks, N., & Steuer, N. (2009). The Happy Planet Index 2.0: Why good lives don't have to cost the Earth. New Economics Foundation.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.

Biggeri, M., Clark, D. A., Ferrannini, A., & Mauro, V. (2019). Tracking the SDGs in an 'integrated' manner: A proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals. World Development, 122, 628-647.

Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Farrugia, N., & Vella, S. (2009). Economic vulnerability and resilience: Concepts and measurements. Oxford Development Studies, 37(3), 229-247.

Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (2000). Aid, policies, and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847-868.

Chowdhury, S., & Squire, L. (2006). Setting weights for aggregate indices: An application to the commitment to development index and human development index. Journal of Development Studies, 42(5), 761-771.

Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press.

Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Pickett, K. E., ... & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 505(7483), 283-285.

Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.

Esteva, G. (1992). Development. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (pp. 6-25). Zed Books.

Fioramonti, L. (2013). Gross domestic problem: The politics behind the world's most powerful number. Zed Books.

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press.

Hilbert, M. (2016). Big data for development: A review of promises and challenges. Development Policy Review, 34(1), 135-174.

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.

Jerven, M. (2013). Poor numbers: How we are misled by African development statistics and what to do about it. Cornell University Press.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5430.

Kelso, A. (2015). Critique of the Human Development Index. Journal of Developing Societies, 31(3), 1-17.

Khondker, H. H. (2004). Glocalization as globalization: Evolution of a sociological concept. Bangladesh e-journal of Sociology, 1(2), 1-9.

Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., Lawn, P., Talberth, J., Jackson, T., & Aylmer, C. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics, 93, 57-68.

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.

O'Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88-95.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Ranis, G., Stewart, F., & Samman, E. (2006). Human development: Beyond the human development index. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 323-358.

Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 235-248.

Ravallion, M. (2012). Troubling tradeoffs in the Human Development Index. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 201-209.

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25-44). Sage.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., ... & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472-475.

Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., Kroll, C., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2021). Sustainable development report 2021. Cambridge University Press.

Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the 2010 Environmental Performance Index. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR, 24785.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., ... & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.

Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press.

UNESCO. (2001). Universal declaration on cultural diversity. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions. UNESCO.

United Nations. (2020). The sustainable development goals report 2020. United Nations Publications.

UN-OHRLLS (United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States). (2015). Small Island Developing States in numbers: Climate change edition 2015. United Nations.

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2020). Human Development Report 2020: The next frontier—Human development and the Anthropocene. UNDP.

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane.

Wolff, H., Chong, H., & Auffhammer, M. (2011). Measuring human development: A stochastic dominance approach. Oxford Development Studies, 39(2), 187-213.

World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators 2023. World Bank Publications.

Bumi Parahyangan, Sundaland, 04 April 2025                                                                        

Lampiran

Lampiran A: Formula Lengkap dan Perhitungan Teknis

A.1 Normalisasi Indikator

Untuk indikator "positif" (higher is better):

$$I_{norm} = \frac{I_{actual} - I_{min}}{I_{max} - I_{min}}$$

Untuk indikator "negatif" (lower is better):

$$I_{norm} = \frac{I_{max} - I_{actual}}{I_{max} - I_{min}}$$

Contoh Perhitungan:

Harapan hidup untuk Jepang = 84.6 tahun

- $I_{min}$ = 50 tahun (observed minimum global)

- $I_{max}$ = 90 tahun (aspirational target)

$$I_{norm} = \frac{84.6 - 50}{90 - 50} = \frac{34.6}{40} = 0.865$$

A.2 Agregasi Sub-Indeks Poros

Poros Ekonomi dengan 7 indikator:

$$PE = \left(I_1 \times I_2 \times I_3 \times I_4 \times I_5 \times I_6 \times I_7\right)^{1/7}$$

Contoh untuk Norway: 

- GNI per capita (normalized): 0.95

- Unemployment (normalized): 0.92

- Gini coefficient (normalized): 0.89

- Poverty rate (normalized): 0.94

- R&D spending (normalized): 0.88

- Financial inclusion (normalized): 0.98

- Economic complexity (normalized): 0.90

$$PE_{Norway} = (0.95 \times 0.92 \times 0.89 \times 0.94 \times 0.88 \times 0.98 \times 0.90)^{1/7}$$

$$PE_{Norway} = (0.584)^{0.143} = 0.92$$

A.3 Perhitungan IGM dengan Pembobotan

Dengan bobot default:

$$IGM = 0.20 \times PE + 0.25 \times PS + 0.25 \times PL + 0.15 \times PB + 0.15 \times PTK$$

Contoh untuk Norway: 

$$IGM_{Norway} = 0.20(0.92) + 0.25(0.96) + 0.25(0.74) + 0.15(0.82) + 0.15(0.97)$$

$$IGM_{Norway} = 0.184 + 0.240 + 0.185 + 0.123 + 0.146 = 0.878$$

A.4 Confidence Intervals

Untuk memperhitungkan uncertainty dalam data, IGM menggunakan bootstrap method untuk mengestimasi confidence intervals:

1. Resample data dengan replacement (1000 iterations)

2. Recalculate IGM untuk setiap bootstrap sample

3. Determine 95% confidence interval dari distribusi bootstrap

Contoh:

Norway IGM = 0.878 [95% CI: 0.869 - 0.887]

Ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada uncertainty, Norway's IGM robustly tinggi.

Lampiran B: Daftar Lengkap Indikator per Poros

B.1 Poros Ekonomi (7 indikator utama)

1. GNI per capita (PPP): World Bank WDI

2. Unemployment rate:  ILO ILOSTAT

3. Gini coefficient:  World Bank PovCalNet

4. Multidimensional poverty rate: UNDP MPI

5. R&D expenditure (% GDP): UNESCO Institute for Statistics

6. Financial inclusion (% adults with account):  World Bank Global Findex

7. Economic Complexity Index:  Harvard Growth Lab Atlas

B.2 Poros Sosial (10 indikator utama)

1. Healthy life expectancy:  WHO GHO

2. Maternal mortality ratio:  WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA

3. Under-5 mortality rate: UNICEF, WHO

4. Universal health coverage index: WHO

5. Mean years of schooling: UNESCO Institute for Statistics

6. Expected years of schooling:  UNESCO Institute for Statistics

7. PISA scores (or regional equivalent): OECD, regional assessments

8. Gender Inequality Index:  UNDP

9. Social cohesion index (composite):  World Values Survey, Gallup

10. Access to basic services (water, sanitation, housing):  WHO/UNICEF JMP, UN-Habitat

B.3 Poros Lingkungan (9 indikator utama)

1. Ecological footprint vs biocapacity:  Global Footprint Network

2. CO2 emissions per capita:  IEA, CDIAC

3. Carbon intensity of economy:  World Bank

4.  PM2.5 air pollution exposure: WHO

5.  Water stress level: FAO AQUASTAT

6. Forest cover (% land area):  FAO Forest Resources Assessment

7. Protected area coverage (% terrestrial & marine): UNEP-WCMC

8. Red List Index (biodiversity):  IUCN

9. Climate Change Performance Index: Germanwatch

B.4 Poros Budaya (6 indikator utama)

1. UNESCO World Heritage Sites (per million population): UNESCO WHC

2. Government expenditure on culture (% GDP): UNESCO Institute for Statistics

3. Linguistic diversity index:  Ethnologue

4. Cultural participation rate:  National surveys, Eurobarometer (Europe)

5. Indigenous rights recognition index: Cultural Survival, IWGIA

6. Cultural vitality index (composite): National cultural surveys

B.5 Poros Tata Kelola (8 indikator utama)

1. Democracy Index:  Economist Intelligence Unit

2. Electoral process and pluralism:  Freedom House

3. Rule of law: World Justice Project

4. Control of corruption: World Bank WGI

5. Government effectiveness:  World Bank WGI

6. Regulatory quality: World Bank WGI

7. Press freedom index:  Reporters Without Borders

8. Civic participation rate: IDEA Voter Turnout Database, civil society surveys

Lampiran C: Pembobotan Kontekstual - Contoh Skenario

 Skenario 1: Small Island Developing State (SIDS)

Contoh: Maldives

Karena vulnerability ekstrem terhadap climate change dan dependency pada marine ecosystems:

- PE: 0.18 (-2%)

- PS: 0.23 (-2%)

- PL: 0.35 (+10%) ← Prioritas tertinggi

- PB: 0.12 (-3%)

- PTK: 0.12 (-3%)

Justifikasi: Kenaikan sea level 1 meter akan menenggelamkan 80% territory. Environmental sustainability adalah existential issue, bukan luxury.

Skenario 2: Post-Conflict State

Contoh: Rwanda 

Focus pada reconciliation, social cohesion, dan institutional rebuilding:

- PE: 0.18 (-2%)

- PS: 0.28 (+3%) ← Social healing prioritized

- PL: 0.22 (-3%)

- PB: 0.13 (-2%)

- PTK: 0.19 (+4%) ← Institution building prioritized

Justifikasi: Setelah genocide, rebuilding social fabric dan trustworthy institutions adalah preconditions untuk sustainable development.

Skenario 3: Cultural Heritage Priority

Contoh: Bhutan (GNH philosophy)

Explicit constitutional commitment terhadap cultural preservation:

- PE: 0.18 (-2%)

- PS: 0.23 (-2%)

- PL: 0.25 (unchanged)

- PB: 0.20 (+5%) ← Cultural preservation prioritized

- PTK: 0.14 (-1%)

Justifikasi:  Bhutanese constitution mandates preservation of cultural heritage; 60% minimum forest cover constitutionally guaranteed.

Lampiran D: Tabel Komparatif - IGM vs Indeks Lainnya

| Dimensi | HDI | GDP per capita | SDG Index | EPI | GPI | IGM |

|---------|-----|----------------|-----------|-----|-----|-----|

| Ekonomi | ✓ (GNI) | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | - | ✓ | ✓✓ |

| Kesehatan | ✓ | - | ✓✓ | - | ✓ | ✓✓ |

| Pendidikan | ✓ | - | ✓✓ | - | ✓ | ✓✓ |

| Ketimpangan | ✗ (IHDI only) | ✗ | ✓ | - | ✓ | ✓✓ |

| Lingkungan | ✗ | ✗ | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ |

| Budaya | ✗ | ✗ | ~ (SDG 11) | ✗ | ~ | ✓✓ |

| Tata Kelola | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ (SDG 16) | ~ | - | ✓✓ |

| Kontekstualisasi Lokal | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓✓✓ |

| Pembobotan Partisipatif | ✗ | N/A | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓✓✓ |

| Dashboard Multidimensi | ~ | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓✓✓ |

Keterangan:

- ✓✓✓ = Comprehensive coverage

- ✓✓ = Substantial coverage

- ✓ = Partial coverage

- ~ = Minimal/implicit coverage

- ✗ = Not covered

- N/A = Not applicable

Lampiran E: Glossary Istilah Teknis

Biocapacity: Kemampuan ekosistem untuk memproduksi biological materials yang digunakan manusia dan untuk menyerap waste materials yang dihasilkan manusia.

Capability Approach:  Pendekatan filosofis terhadap welfare economics dan development yang dikembangkan oleh Amartya Sen, focusing pada what people are able to do and be (capabilities) rather than resources they have.

Ecological Footprint: Ukuran demand manusia terhadap nature, dinyatakan dalam area biologically productive land dan sea yang required untuk produce resources dan absorb waste.

Economic Complexity:  Ukuran productive knowledge yang embedded dalam ekonomi suatu negara, reflected dalam diversity dan sophistication of products yang diproduksi.

Gini Coefficient: Statistical measure of income atau wealth inequality dalam population, ranging dari 0 (perfect equality) hingga 1 (perfect inequality).

Glocalization:  Proses di mana global ideas adapted ke local contexts atau local cultures promoted ke global audience.

Goalposts:  Dalam konteks index construction, nilai minimum dan maximum yang used untuk normalize indicators.

Governance:  Proses decision-making dan proses di mana decisions implemented (atau tidak implemented), including formal institutions dan informal arrangements.

Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE):  Average number of years seseorang expected untuk live dalam "full health," accounting untuk years lived dengan disease atau disability.

Human Development Index (HDI):  Composite index mengukur average achievement dalam three basic dimensions: long and healthy life, knowledge, dan decent standard of living.

Multidimensional Poverty:  Poverty understood sebagai deprivation across multiple dimensions (health, education, standard of living) rather than income alone.

Planetary Boundaries: Framework identifying nine Earth system processes yang memiliki planetary boundaries yang humanity should not transgress untuk maintain "safe operating space."

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP):  Exchange rate di mana currency of one country would have to be converted into that of another untuk buy sama amount of goods and services.

Resilience: Capacity of system untuk absorb disturbance dan reorganize while undergoing change, still retaining essentially sama function, structure, dan feedbacks.

Rule of Law:  Political situation bukan arbitrary rule by government officials, tapi rule by law yang is generally applicable, known in advance, dan uniformly applied.

Social Cohesion: Willingness of members of society untuk cooperate dengan each other untuk survive dan prosper, including sense of shared identity dan common purpose.

Sustainable Development: Development yang meets needs of present tanpa compromising ability of future generations untuk meet their own needs.

Penutup: Mengukur Apa yang Benar-Benar Penting

Perjalanan untuk mengembangkan Indeks Glokal Multiporos dimulai dengan pertanyaan sederhana namun fundamental: *Bagaimana kita tahu jika kita benar-benar maju sebagai masyarakat global?*

GDP memberi tahu kita bahwa ekonomi global tumbuh, namun tidak menjelaskan mengapa happiness tidak meningkat sebanding. HDI memberi tahu kita bahwa pendidikan dan kesehatan membaik, namun tidak menjelaskan mengapa degradasi lingkungan mempercepat. SDGs memberi tahu kita apa yang harus dicapai, namun tidak cukup menangkap bagaimana berbagai konteks lokal memerlukan pendekatan berbeda.

IGM adalah upaya untuk menjembatani gap ini—untuk menciptakan compass yang menunjukkan bukan hanya ke satu arah (pertumbuhan ekonomi), tapi ke segala arah yang constitutes human flourishing: ekonomi yang inklusif, masyarakat yang adil dan sehat, lingkungan yang berkelanjutan, budaya yang vibrant, dan governance yang accountable.

Yang paling penting, IGM mengakui bahwa tidak ada satu formula universal untuk pembangunan. Norway dan Costa Rica, meskipun sangat berbeda dalam GDP, keduanya dapat mencapai high wellbeing melalui paths yang berbeda. China dan India, dengan sepertiga populasi dunia, tidak bisa dan tidak seharusnya mengikuti exact same development model seperti Western countries. Bhutan's focus pada Gross National Happiness bukan quirk, tapi legitimate alternative vision.

Dalam kata-kata Mahatma Gandhi: "The world has enough for everyone's need, but not enough for everyone's greed." IGM, dengan Poros Lingkungannya, mengoperasionalkan wisdom ini—measuring bukan hanya how much kita consume, tapi bagaimana sustainably kita live.

Dalam kata-kata Amartya Sen: "Development is freedom." IGM, dengan kelima porosnya, mengoperasionalkan vision ini—measuring expansion of capabilities across economic, social, environmental, cultural, dan political spheres.

Implementasi IGM tidak akan mudah. Akan ada resistensi dari mereka yang benefited dari status quo metrics. Akan ada legitimate concerns tentang data quality, comparability, dan potential untuk misuse. Akan ada debates tentang weights, indicators, dan philosophical foundations.

Namun, debat itu sendiri adalah valuable. Proses engaging dengan question "apa yang constitutes good development?" adalah sebagai penting sebagai answer yang kita arrive. Jika IGM stimulates conversations—di parliaments, universities, community meetings—tentang apa yang truly matters untuk wellbeing, maka ia telah served purpose-nya bahkan sebelum satu ranking published.

Akhirnya, IGM adalah invitation: invitation untuk memikirkan pembangunan more holistically, untuk menghormati diversity lebih deeply, dan untuk berkomitmen pada sustainability lebih seriously. Ia adalah reminder bahwa dalam interconnected world, no country adalah island—environmental degradation anywhere threatens everyone, inequality anywhere undermines prosperity everywhere, dan cultural extinction anywhere impoverishes humanity as whole.

Mari kita mengukur dengan wisdom. Mari kita develop dengan compassion. Mari kita build future di mana every person, dalam every nation, dapat flourish dalam all dimensions yang makes life worth living.

IGM bukan tentang ranking negara. IGM tentang mapping paths menuju shared flourishing.

Acknowledgments 

Artikel ini mensintesiskan insights dari berbagai tradisi intelektual—economics, sociology, environmental science, anthropology, political science—dan berbagai praktisi pembangunan di seluruh dunia. Utang gratitude kepada pioneers seperti Mahbub ul Haq, Amartya Sen, Kate Raworth, dan countless lainnya yang have challenged conventional metrics dan expanded our understanding of human development.

Conflict of Interest Statement 

Penulis menyatakan tidak memiliki conflict of interest finansial atau lainnya terkait penelitian ini.

Funding 

Ini adalah conceptual paper tanpa funding eksternal.

Korespondensi: 

Untuk inquiries tentang Indeks Glokal Multiporos, silakan hubungi:

Sundaland Researchers Society and Masyarakat Peneliti Mandiri Sunda Nusantara, Indonesia

Citation:

Rohmandar, Asep. (2025). Desain Indeks Glokal Multiporos untuk Negara Anggota PBB: Sebuah Kerangka Komprehensif untuk Mengukur Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Era Global-Lokal. [Journal Name], [Volume](Issue), [Pages]. Mungkin jika ada donatur Internasional dipublikasikan ke jurnal tahun 2026/2027

"The future is not some place we are going, but one we are creating. The paths are not to be found, but made. And the activity of making them changes both the maker and the destination."* 

— John Schaar, Political Theorist

AKHIR ARTIKEL

Jumlah Kata: ~15,000

Jumlah Referensi: 50+

Jumlah Tabel/Lampiran: 5